Search This Blog

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Protein, Glucagon and Insulin

Source: Conscious eating
The two basic hormones we need to keep in check are insulin and glucagon. Both are released by the pancreas in response to different foods. Eating carbohydrates raises blood sugar and stimulates the release of insulin. Insulin lowers the blood sugar by telling the body to store glucose for future use. The body creates glycogen, strings of glucose molecules, and stores it in the muscles and liver.
Only the glycogen stored in the liver is available to return to circulation and keep adequate supplies of glucose going to the brain. The liver's total capacity for storage is rather limited and is depleted within 10-12 hours. So the liver's glycogen reserves must be continually replenished by eating carbohydrates. [Bee's note: However 58% of protein and 10% of good fats also are made into glycogen by the body, so you do not need to replenish it by eating carbs.]
The problem comes when excess carbohydrates are consumed. Once the liver and muscles have stored as much glycogen as possible (about the amount of three candy bars), the body creates another storage form, fat. Insulin tells your body not only to store new fat, but also not to release any previously stored fat. Insulin is the storage hormone.
Glucagon [Note: this is different than Glycogen above], on the other hand, has the opposite effect to insulin. It tells the body to increase the blood sugar. It is the mobilization hormone.
Protein stimulates the release of glucagon, which stimulates the liver to release stored carbohydrates from its glycogen stores and from fat. Glucagon also inhibits the release of insulin. By controlling your intake of protein and spreading it throughout the day, you can constantly produce adequate amounts of glucagon.

Source: lowcarbdiets.about.com
Unlike high carbohydrate diets, protein triggers a response in the stomach that affects motility and stimulates the release of glucagon, a hormone that helps us to burn previously stored fat. In normal people, within thirty minutes of eating a small amount of protein, glucagon starts to rise, peaking at two hours. In fact, glucagon can stay elevated in blood for several hours after a protein rich meal. This gives your body plenty of time to use the fat stored around your waist and hips for fuel.

Protein Power - Summary

From: Protein Power - Summary
This book by Dr. Michael R. Eades, M.D. and Dr. Mary Dan Eades, M.D. provides a great deal of information for $6.99. The title is a bit misleading. The book is not about eating large amounts of protein. The program is moderate in protein. It is more about keeping carbohydrate intake down to healthier levels. It is highly recommended for anyone who wants to clearly understand why it is carbohydrates - starches and sugars - rather than natural fats that are at the root of the modern decline in health. Those who have conditions which normally require the services of a physician are urged to consult one.
According to food surveys, the most commonly eaten food in the USA is white flour in the form of bread, pasta and similar foods. The runner up is white flour and sugar combinations such as pie, cake, cookies, donuts, etc.
All carbohydrates, both starch and sugars, are converted to sugar in the digestive process. White flour is in the form of sugar by the time it reaches the blood. Carbohydrate intake causes a rise in blood sugar. A rise in blood sugar causes a rise in insulin. The pancreas has to put out insulin to enable blood sugar to enter cells for energy production, and to keep the blood sugar level normal.
In children, the insulin receptors on the cells usually respond to insulin normally, and a fairly small amount of insulin is able to keep blood sugar in the normal range in spite of large sugar and starch consumption. Some people can eat lots of starch and sugar all their lives and stay thin. Their health is not as good as it could have been, but they do not develop obesity, high blood pressure, heart disease, or diabetes.
Many people do not have a good nutrient constitution inherently — caused by their mother's poor diet during pregnancy. The high intake of carbohydrates and resulting insulin production results in the cells becoming less and less responsive to insulin.
It takes larger and larger amounts of insulin to enable cells to take in blood sugar and to keep the blood sugar level normal. This is insulin resistance. The first sign of this problem in most people is weight gain. Why is this? It is because insulin is a storage hormone.
In excess amounts insulin causes the body to store both fat and blood sugar as fat. This weight gain may come at age 10 or 30 or later. But it is a sign of insulin resistance and high levels of insulin in the blood. Some people do not gain weight as their insulin rises, but do develop high blood pressure or heart disease.
Insulin is not a "bad" hormone (any more than LDL is "bad" cholesterol). You would be very ill and die without it. But in excess, it causes big problems.
The role of insulin:
  • Insulin lowers high blood sugar.
  • Insulin puts the metabolism in storage mode.
  • Insulin converts protein and blood sugar to fat.
  • Insulin causes fat in the diet to be stored in fat cells.
  • Insulin increases the production of cholesterol by the body.
  • Insulin causes the kidneys to retain water in the body.
  • Insulin stimulates the growth of artery wall cells.
  • Insulin stimulates the use of blood sugar for energy.
There is a second hormone involved in these processes. It is called glucagon. Glucagon works in opposition to insulin and has the opposite effects:
  • Glucagon raises low blood sugar.
  • Glucagon puts the metabolism in burning mode.
  • Glucagon converts protein and fat to glucose.
  • Glucagon causes dietary fat to be used for energy.
  • Glucagon releases fat from fat cells to be used for energy.
  • Glucagon reduces cholesterol production.
  • Glucagon causes the kidneys to release water from the body.
  • Glucagon causes artery wall cells to return to normal.
  • Glucagon stimulates the use of fat for energy.
It does not take a towering IQ to see that reducing insulin and raising glucagon is in our best interests! The goal is the correct balance of both hormones. There is a cheap, safe, and effective way to do this.
It is not a shot or pill. It is a matter of keeping protein intake at the correct level, and reducing carbohydrate intake to the level that is needed. The book gives instructions on how to calculate the lean body weight and protein needed.
Until the calculation is made, women can start with three ounces of protein foods per meal and men can start with four ounces.
The carbohydrate intake must be reduced to 10 grams three times a day if there is obesity, high blood pressure, abnormal blood fats, or type II diabetes. For a person just wanting to lose a few pounds, a reduction to 55 grams a day is a good place to start.
Important Notes
  • Carbohydrate greatly raises insulin and has no effect on glucagon.
  • A high carbohydrate and low protein diet has the greatest adverse effect on the insulin-glucagon ratio.
  • Protein slightly raises both.
  • Fat has no effect on either.
A diet that is moderate in protein and low in carbohydrate is the best way to have ideal levels of both insulin and glucagon. This is good news, but when you try reducing carbohydrate intake, you will find out just how addicted you are!
"Syndrome X": What does all this have to do with major illnesses that kill people? The medical community generally views obesity, diabetes, high cholesterol, heart disease, and hypertension as conditions that need to be diagnosed and treated.
But these conditions all have one thing in common - elevated insulin levels. Some researchers are calling insulin resistance and the resulting problems "syndrome X". These conditions caused by high insulin are generally treated with drugs that can cause even more problems.
And if dietary changes are suggested, it will almost certainly be in the direction of decreasing fat (and thus protein because protein foods usually contains fat) and increasing carbohydrates.
And what did I just say about a high carbohydrate and low protein diet? It is the worst combination in that it raises insulin and reduces glucagon. (This is why some of us have long believed that the diet suggested by the American Heart Association, television reporters, and most of the medical community is the diet most likely to CAUSE heart disease.)
Obesity: Weight gain is often the first sign that insulin levels are rising. The cells no longer respond well to insulin, so more and more must be produced to force blood sugar into cells for energy production. Insulin forces glucose, fat and protein into storage as fat.
Diabetes: (This mainly applies to type II diabetes, but the low carbohydrate diet also makes type I easier to treat.) Even after insulin levels have started to rise, the blood sugar usually stays in the normal range. But as the person continues to live on a high starch and sugar diet, the insulin receptors on the cells are further damaged and eventually the pancreas can no longer make enough insulin to meet the increasing need.
The blood sugar level goes up, glucose appears in the urine, and a diagnosis of "diabetes" will be made if a physician is consulted. Treatment may be oral medications to force the pancreas to make even more insulin, or injected insulin itself may be used. There may be high blood pressure, heart disease, and there will be declining health.
High blood pressure: Excess insulin causes blood pressure to go up in at least three ways: First, it causes the kidneys to retain both sodium and water in the body.
Second, it causes a thickening of artery walls and makes them less elastic. And finally, excess insulin stimulates the nervous system to release other hormones which raise blood pressure.
High blood fats: Triglycerides are a blood fat that is actually made from carbohydrates. Excess carbohydrate raises triglycerides. Cholesterol is made in excess amounts by the liver if insulin levels are too high.
You can either poison the liver into submission (my wording, not theirs) with medication, or reduce the carbohydrate intake. If you listen to the TV dietitians and try to reduce your fat and cholesterol intake, you will probably eat more carbohydrates to replace the lost calories.
Ancient cultures and their skeletal or mummified remains have been studied many times. Ancient Egyptians were bread eaters. Soldiers were issued five pounds of bread a day. Egyptians ate very large amounts of whole grain breads, plus fruits and vegetables. Almost no red meat.
Some fish and poultry. The diet was fairly low in fat and protein, very high in complex carbohydrates. A nutritionist's dream, one might think. It was what modern wisdom would consider the ideal.
They should have been very healthy according to current thinking. But they were not. They suffered from clogged arteries, obesity, poor teeth, and other degenerative conditions.
I have wondered for years why ancient Egyptians had heart disease without the benefit of factories and processed foods. Now we know. The very high starch intake produced high levels of insulin.
In fact, researchers can tell if skeletal remains are from hunter-gatherers or grain growers just by looking at them. The hunters have stronger skeletons and better teeth.

Top 15 Reasons You Are Not Losing Weight on a Low-Carb Diet

by Kris Gunnars

Low-carb diets are very effective. That is a scientific fact.
However, as with any diet, people sometimes stop losing before they reach their desired weight.
Here are the top 15 reasons why you’re not losing weight on a low-carb diet.

1. You Are Losing Fat, You Just Don’t Realize it

Weight loss isn’t a linear process.
If you weigh yourself every day, then there will be days where the scale goes down, other days where it goes up.
It doesn’t mean that the diet isn’t working, as long as the general trend is going downwards.
Many people lose a lot of weight in the first week of low-carbing, but it is mostly water weight. Weight loss will slow down significantly after that initial phase.
Of course, losing weight is not the same as losing fat.
It is possible, especially if you’re new to weight lifting, that you are gaining muscle at the same time that you’re losing fat.
To make sure that you’re losing, use something other than just the scale (which is a big, fat liar). Use a measuring tape to measure your waist circumference and have your body fat percentage measured every month or so.
Also, take pictures. Take note of how your clothes fit. If you’re looking thinner and your clothes are looser, then you ARE losing fat no matter what the scale says.
Bottom Line: Weight loss isn’t linear and there’s a lot more to weight than just body fat. Be patient and use other ways of measuring than just the scale.

2. You’re Not Cutting Back on Carbohydrates Enough

Some people are more carb sensitive than others.
If you’re eating low-carb and your weight starts to plateau, then you may want to cut back on carbs even further.
In that case, go under 50 grams of carbs per day.
When you go under 50 grams per day then you’re going to have to eliminate most fruits from your diet, although you can have berries in small amounts.
If that doesn’t work either, going under 20 grams temporarily can work… eating just protein, healthy fats and leafy green vegetables.
Bottom Line: If you are carb sensitive, then you may want to temporarily eliminate fruits and eat less than 50 grams of carbs per day.

3. You’re Stressed All The Time

Unfortunately, it isn’t always enough to just eat healthy and exercise.
We need to make sure that our bodies are functioning optimally and that our hormonal environment is favorable.

Being stressed all the time keeps the body in a constant state of “fight or flight” – with elevated levels of stress hormones like cortisol.
Having chronically elevated cortisol levels can increase your hunger and cravings for unhealthy foods (1, 2).
If you want to cut back on stress, try meditation and deep breathing exercises. Cut back on distractions like Facebook and news media, read more books instead.
Bottom Line: Chronic stress can have negative effects on your hormonal environment, making you hungrier and preventing you from losing weight.

4. You’re Not Eating Real Food


A low-carb diet is about more than just lowering your intake of carbs.
You have to replace those carbohydrates with real, nutritious foods.
Throw away all processed low-carb products like Atkins bars, they are not real food and they are NOT good for your health.
Stick to meats, fish, eggs, vegetables and healthy fats if you need to lose weight.
Also, “treats” like paleo cookies and brownies can cause problems even though they’re made with healthy ingredients. They should be considered as occasional treats, not something you eat every day.
What is also important is to eat enough FAT. If you try to cut back on carbs AND fat, you will end up ravenously hungry and feel like crap.

Eating a diet with nothing but protein is a very bad idea. Low-carb, high-fat andmoderate protein is the way to go if you want to get into ketosis, which is the optimal hormonal environment to burn body fat.
Bottom Line: You need to replace the carbs with real, nutritious foods. To lose weight, stick to meats, fish, eggs, healthy fats and vegetables.

5. You’re Eating Too Many Nuts


Nuts are real foods, no doubt about that.
They are also very high in fat, almonds for example having about 70% of calories as fat.
However, nuts are very easy to overeat on.
Their crunchiness and high energy density give us the ability to eat large amounts of them without feeling full.
I personally can eat a bag of nuts and still not feel satisfied, even though that one bag contains more calories than a meal.
If you’re snacking on nuts every day (or worse, nut butters) then chances are that you’re just eating way too many calories.
Bottom Line: Nuts have a very high energy density and are easy to overeat on. If you’re constantly snacking on nuts, try eliminating them.

6. You’re Not Sleeping Enough

Sleep is incredibly important for overall health and studies show that a lack of sleep correlates with weight gain and obesity (3, 4).

A lack of sleep can make us feel hungrier (5, 6). It will also make us tired and less motivated to exercise and eat healthy.
Sleep is one of the pillars of health. If you’re doing everything right but still not getting proper sleep, then you won’t see anywhere near the results you might expect.
If you have a sleeping disorder, see a doctor. They are often easily treatable.
Some tips to improve sleep:
  • Avoid caffeine after 2pm.
  • Sleep in complete darkness.
  • Avoid alcohol and physical exercise in the last few hours before sleep.
  • Do something relaxing before sleep, like reading.
  • Try to go to bed at a similar time each night.
Bottom Line: Sleep is absolutely crucial for optimal health. Studies show that a lack of sleep can make you eat more and gain weight.

7. You’re Eating Too Much Dairy


Another low-carb food that can cause problems for some people is dairy.
Some dairy products, despite being low in carbs, are still pretty high in protein.
Protein, like carbs, can raise insulin levels, which drives energy into storage.
The amino acid composition in dairy protein makes it very potent at spiking insulin. In fact, dairy proteins can spike insulin as much as white bread (7, 8).
Even though you may seem to tolerate dairy products just fine, eating them often and spiking insulin can be detrimental to the metabolic adaptation that needs to take place in order to reap the full benefits of low-carb diets.
In this case, avoid milk, cut back on the cheese, yogurt and cream. Butter is fine as it is very low in protein and lactose and therefore won’t spike insulin.
Bottom Line: The amino acid composition in dairy proteins make them spike insulin fairly effectively. Try eliminating all dairy except butter.

8. You’re Not Exercising Right (or at all)

You should NOT exercise with the goal of burning calories.
The calories burned during exercise are usually insignificant, they can easily be negated by eating a few extra bites of food at the next meal.

However, exercise is critical for both physical and mental health.
Exercise, in the long run, can help you lose weight by improving your metabolic health, increasing your muscle mass and making you feel awesome.
But it’s important to do the right kind of exercise. Nothing but cardio on the treadmill is unlikely to give you good results and doing too much may even be detrimental.
Weight lifting – this will greatly improve your hormonal environment and increase your muscle mass, which will help you lose weight over the long term.
Interval training – doing high intensity intervals is an excellent form of cardio that improves your metabolism and raises your levels of human growth hormone.
Low intensity – being active and doing some low-intensity work like walking is a great idea. The human body was designed to move around, not sit in a chair all day.
Bottom Line: The right kinds of exercise improve your hormonal environment, increase your muscle mass and make you feel awesome.

9. You’re Eating Too Many Sweeteners


Despite some sweeteners having no calories, they canaffect our appetite levels.
Several studies show that artificial sweeteners can affect appetite, either negatively or positively, in some cases making people eat more overall calories (9, 10).
Additionally, consumption of artificial sweeteners is associated with weight gain in the long term (1112).
This probably depends on the individual, but if you’re eating a lot of sweeteners and aren’t losing weight then you may want to try removing them.
Bottom Line: Despite being calorie free, artificial sweeteners can affect our appetite, in some cases leading to a net increase in overall calories.

10. You Have a Medical Condition Getting in Your Way


There are certain medications that are known to stimulate weight gain.
If you look at the list of side effects for the medications you are taking and see “weight gain” on the list – then make an appointment with your doctor.
Perhaps there is another drug available that doesn’t cause weight gain.
If you’re doing everything right and still aren’t getting results, then perhaps you have some underlying medical problem.
Many hormonal disorders can cause problems losing weight, particularly hypothyroidism.
In that case, make an appointment with your doctor. Explain that you’re having problems losing weight and that you want to rule out any medical issues.
Bottom Line: Certain medical issues and medications can cause weight problems. See a doctor to discuss your options.

11. You’re Always Eating

It is a persistent myth in health and fitness circles that everyone should be eating many, small meals throughout the day.
This has actually been studied thoroughly. No advantage has been found to eating more frequent and smaller meals (13, 14).
It is natural for humans to eat fewer meals per day and sometimes go long time periods without food.
Some people do something called intermittent fasting, eating in an 8 hour window each day or doing 24 hour fasts 1-2 times per week. This can be very useful to break through a plateau.
Bottom Line: There is no proven benefit to eating many small meals throughout the day. Try eating fewer meals and consider giving intermittent fasting a shot.

12. You’re Cheating Too Often

For people who are able to control themselves, having cheat meals or days every now and then may be fine.
For others, especially those who are prone to food addiction, having cheat meals is likely to do more harm than good.
If you’re cheating often… either with “small cheats” here and there or entire days where you eat nothing but junk food, then it can easily ruin your progress.
Having more than 1-2 cheat meals per week (or one cheat day) is going to be excessive.
If you just can’t seem to control yourself around unhealthy foods no matter what you try, then perhaps you have food addiction. In that case, completely removing the junk foods from your life is probably a good idea.
Bottom Line: Some people can eat junk food from time to time without ruining their progress, but that doesn’t apply to everyone. For others, cheat meals will do more harm than good.

13. You’re Eating Too Many Calories

At the end of the day, calories do matter.
One of the main reasons low-carb diets are so effective is that they reduce appetite and make people eat less overall calories without trying.
If you’re not losing weight but are doing all the right things, then try counting calories for a while.
Aim for a deficit of 500 calories per day, which theoretically should make you lose 1 pound of weight per week (doesn’t always work in practice).
Bottom Line: It is possible to eat so many calories that you stop losing weight. Try counting calories and aim for a 500 cal/day deficit for a while.

14. You Don’t Have Realistic Expectations

At the end of the day, weight loss takes time.
It is a marathon, not a race.
Losing 1-2 pounds per week is a realistic goal.
Some people will lose weight faster than that, others slower.
But it’s also important to keep in mind that not everyone can look like a fitness model.
At some point, you will reach a healthy set point weight, which may be above what you initially hoped for.
Bottom Line: It is important to have realistic expectations. Weight loss takes a long time and not everyone can look like a fitness model.

15. You’ve Been “Cutting” For Too Long

I don’t think it’s a good idea to be in a calorie deficit for too long at a time.
The leanest people on earth (bodybuilders and fitness models) never do this. They do cycles of “bulking” and “cutting.”
If you eat at a calorie deficit for many months (or years) then eventually your metabolic rate may slow down.
If you’ve been dieting for a long time, then a two month period where you aim to “maintain” and gain a bit of muscle may be what you need to get things started again.
Of course, this doesn’t mean eating bad foods, just more of the good stuff.
After these two months are over, you can start “dieting” again.


Comments:
Reason 11. Several meals (with protein) a day is good for regulating the insulin response without promoting too much fat storage response. It is also good for people exercising heavily like body builders to maintain muscle (more active muscle the more calories burned when mobile). Getting used to smaller meals means the stomach does not need to expand so much and so you might not crave very large meals. Also, you might not over eat because you do not feel famished (when you let yourself get so hungry you will tend to gouge on food that becomes available and eat more than you otherwise would).

This is a very personal choice and will not suit everyone. Find out which is better for you at controlling appetite, maintaining muscle and most importantly making you feel well.


Monday, 3 June 2013

YOUR FAT HAS A BRAIN. SERIOUSLY. AND IT'S TRYING TO KILL YOU.


Body fat is just an inert layer of blubber, right? If only. New research shows that it's more like a toxic parasite that doesn't want to let go. The good news: if you exercise and eat right, you can force it to.
By: BILL GIFFORD

Phil Bruno was super-sizing again. It was just past 5:30 on a spring evening in 2004, and he was driving home from work. He pulled into a White Castle, one of many fast-food outlets lining Route 100 in his hometown of Manchester, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. He was only a mile from his house, where his wife, Susan, was cooking the usual big Italian dinner for their family of five, but he was hungry now. The urge was automatic.
Ten minutes later, with a bag of burgers steaming on the seat beside him, he pulled into a McDonald’s and ordered a Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese, an apple pie, and a chocolate shake to wash it all down. “I did this because I would be embarrassed to order too much from one drive-through,” Phil explained to me. “I didn’t want the person at the window to look at me funny.”
Phil had always loved food, which was part of the fabric of his tight-knit Sicilian-American family: Grandma and her lasagna were right down the street. But he’d been athletic in his youth, playing high school football and carrying a robust but reasonable 215 pounds on a six-foot-three-inch frame. Then, in his mid-twenties, he’d stopped working out, as many of us do when life starts to chew up our time. Over the years, his regular meals and high-calorie bingeing had turned him into a physical and emotional wreck. His joints ached whenever he used the stairs, his heart hammered, and he was possessed by a strange, burning thirst that no amount of ice water could quench. “I was 47 years old,” he says, “but I felt like I was 80.”
Prodded by a friend, Bruno finally went to see his long-time family physician, Don Livingston, in early 2004. The results were harrowing: his blood pressure was at a firehose-like 230 over 150, his blood sugar was off the charts, and his A1C—an important blood marker for diabetes—was 16. (It should have been under six.) He weighed a scale-crushing 470 pounds.
Phil had developed Type 2 diabetes, but that was just one of his problems. He walked out of the doctor’s office with prescriptions for 12 different medications and supplements, from fish oil to blood-pressure medicine to Lipitor for his cholesterol to Glucophage for his diabetes. And he never forgot Dr. Livingston’s ominous words at the end of the visit. “Bruno,” he had said, “you should be dropping dead any second.”
Everyone knows that being fat is bad for you, but most people can’t explain exactly why. Some reasons are obvious. Fat tends to go hand in hand with diabetes, and more weight means increased stress on joints and the heart. More puzzling to researchers is that excess fat seems to be linked with cancer of the kidneys, colon, and liver, and even to cognitive decline.
Until fairly recently, fat was thought to be inert, evolution’s wobbly way of letting humans store energy for lean times. And we’ve long known that it’s better to be slightly overweight than underweight, as a recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reiterates.
Starting in the 1990s, though, scientists began to realize that fat is best understood as a single huge endocrine gland, one that wields powerful influence over the rest of the body. “For a typical North American, their fat tissue is their biggest organ,” says James Kirkland, M.D., director of the Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging at the Mayo Clinic.
Not everything about fat is bad, of course. Fat tissue under the skin, known as subcutaneous fat—the kind that makes young people look succulent and ripe—is essentially padding that protects the body from injury, and it also helps fight infection and heal wounds. “Sub-q” fat produces an important hormone called adiponectin, which appears to help control metabolism and protect against certain cancers, notably breast cancer.
The bad news is that, as we age, we gradually lose this good fat, which is one reason why our hands get bonier. Instead, men and women alike tend to build up blobby fat on our midsections. Over the past decade or so, Kirkland and other scientists have discovered that this so-called visceral fat infiltrates our vital organs, bathing them in a nasty chemical stew that wreaks havoc in the body. Visceral fat produces an array of cell-signaling proteins called cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), which causes chronic inflammation, and TNF-alpha, for tumor necrosis factor, which has been linked to cancer.
Kirkland and other researchers have come to believe that, in addition to the problems associated with diabetes and heart disease, fat may actually help accelerate the aging process. In a 2008 experiment, scientists at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University surgically removed abdominal fat from obese lab rats and found that the rodents lived significantly longer than their chubby cousins. In a more recent study, not yet published, the Einstein team found that surgical fat removal prevented some colorectal cancers in mice that were genetically predisposed to those tumors.
Unfortunately for Phil Bruno, surgery wasn’t an option: liposuction only removes the good subcutaneous fat, which is why several recent studies have associated the procedure with negative health outcomes. In humans, says Einstein researcher Nir Barzilai, visceral fat can’t be removed safely because it’s so deeply intertwined with blood vessels and organs. So Bruno called on the only thing in his body that was powerful enough to fight it off: muscle.
ON JUNE 6, 2004, roughly a month after his grim diagnosis, Bruno did the one thing his doctor hadn’t prescribed: he went to a gym. Dr. Livingston had suggested he lose weight, but he stopped short of recommending exercise. That’s typical. One study found that less than half of U.S. physicians discuss exercise with their patients.
After getting his heart checked out via a stress test—it was enlarged, but his arteries were clean, thanks to Grandma’s olive oil—Phil walked into his local Gold’s Gym on a Sunday morning. He looked around uncertainly before settling on the one piece of equipment that seemed feasible for a 470-pound man: the exercise bike. He got himself aboard and managed to pedal for five minutes before he had to stop, wheezing and panting and feeling self-conscious. Yet he came back the next day and the next. Soon he could manage 30 minutes on the bike, leaving a bigger sweat puddle on the floor each time. He saw every drop as a blob of fat exiting his body, one tiny step toward his goal.
In those early weeks at the gym, Bruno would often walk past a glass-walled indoor-cycling studio. With its atmosphere of pounding music and lithe bodies pumping away on stationary bikes, the room seemed off-limits to someone like him. It took Bruno another week or two to work up the courage to go in for a class, and he instinctively skulked to a bike in the back corner. The instructor, a fit blonde, came over and greeted him. “I’m Beth,” she said, smiling. “Let’s help you get set up.”
Beth Sanborn was a local triathlete who was training for her second Ironman. She helped keep Bruno motivated as he suffered through the 45-minute class, puffing and churning away. He soon became a regular, showing up six times a week. He got to know everyone, and his relentlessly upbeat personality made him a favorite of the instructors. “I had never seen anybody that big,” Sanborn recalls. “He was the hardest-working person in my class. A man on a mission—he really was.”
Bruno often rode until his shorts were bloody, because they don’t make bike shorts (or seats) that fit people who weigh more than 400 pounds. “It wasn’t pretty,” he says. By September, he decided to take on an even bigger challenge: he would try a 100-mile bike ride, a century to combat MS, which his wife Susan had been diagnosed with a few years previously. He hadn’t been on a real bike in 20 years, but he dragged his old Trek out of the basement, dusted it off, and took it to the shop.
He made it all the way to mile 63, stopping on a slight incline when the road seemed like it was starting to wobble and melt. He felt pains in his chest, and, ominously, he had stopped sweating, a possible sign of heatstroke. The sag wagon pulled up and the event staff rushed to his aid, grabbing his arms to keep him from collapsing. “The thought actually went through my mind that if I die here on the road,” Bruno told me, “at least I’m doing something to change my life.”
WITHOUT KNOWING IT, PHIL had kicked off a war for control of his body, with fat on one side and muscle on the other. Just as fat was long thought to be neutral, muscle was considered a passive organ that did what the brain told it to do. But muscle is now known to be one of the most dynamic systems in the body; when it contracts, it undergoes huge changes at the cellular level. And its mortal enemy is fat.
In any sedentary, inactive person—including people who aren’t actually obese—fat invades the muscles, slipping in between muscle fibers like the marbling in Wagyu beef. Worse, fat infiltrates individual muscle cells in the form of lipid droplets that make the cells sluggish. According to Gerald Shulman, M.D., a prominent diabetes researcher at Yale, these pools of fat, which occur in both the liver and the muscles, block a key step in the conversion of glucose, leading to the insulin resistance that’s a prerequisite for diabetes. This explains why some sedentary people of normal weight are still at risk for the disease. “It’s not how much fat we have but how it’s distributed,” Shulman says. “When the fat builds up where it doesn’t belong, in the muscle and liver cells, that’s what leads to Type 2 diabetes.”
On a strictly mechanical level, more fat means less muscle, which means fewer mitochondria, the cellular power plants that are most plentiful in muscle tissue. The majority of fat contains almost no mitochondria. This explains one of the nagging problems with obesity: the more fat you accumulate, the harder it becomes for your body to burn off that stored energy.
With his intense cycling, Bruno was growing new muscle, obviously, and that helped. “The more muscle you have, the more mitochondria you have, so you can burn more fat,” says Iñigo San Millán, an exercise physiologist at the University of Colorado in Denver, who has worked with elite cyclists for two decades. San Millán notes that slow-twitch muscle fibers, the most prominent muscle type in endurance athletes, are far more mitochondria-dense than any other kind. So they’re much more efficient at burning fat.
Second, Bruno’s new muscle tissue was actually changing his body chemistry in ways that science is just beginning to understand.
For decades, researchers suspected that muscle exerted some kind of influence on other organs, starting with the liver, which acts as the body’s fuel depot. When we work out intensely or for long periods, the liver is prompted to send out more glucose, the primary fuel for physical activity. It was long thought that those signals traveled via the nervous system and brain, but experiments in the '90s on patients with spinal paralysis revealed that there had to be some other pathway, because their livers still responded to muscle stimulation, as did their brains. They even experienced runner’s high.
In 2003, biologists Mark Febbraio, from Australia, and Bente Pedersen, of Denmark, figured out that muscle is an endocrine organ, just like fat, and that exercising muscle produces chemical secretions—which they called myokines—that communicate with the rest of the body. As Pedersen puts it: “Skeletal muscle is the organ that counteracts fat.”
Febbraio and Pedersen identified the most common myokine as none other than IL-6, the inflammatory cytokine that’s also produced by excess fat. But when released during exercise, they found, IL-6 actually had beneficial effects, telling the liver to increase the rate of fat oxidation. “When we made this discovery, people really didn’t believe us, because IL-6 was considered a bad actor in many diseases,” says Febbraio, a former professional triathlete. “But the thing is, in exercise it’s actually anti-inflammatory.”
The difference had to do with time. Obese patients tended to have low but constant levels of IL-6, which caused chronic inflammation. When patients exercised, their IL-6 levels would spike, then dissipate over a few hours. The patients who exercised had much lower baseline levels of inflammation.
Since then, dozens of these myokines have been identified. Febbraio believes there could be hundreds more and that they’re largely responsible for the beneficial effects of exercise. They act on bones, the pancreas (which secretes insulin), and the immune system. Researchers think they may also act on muscle itself, promoting growth and healing, and on the brain, triggering the release of derived neurotrophic factor, which heals and protects neurons.
“There’s a growing body of evidence suggesting that healthy muscle may lead to a healthier liver, a healthier gut, a healthier pancreas, and a healthier brain,” says Nathan LeBrasseur, a Mayo Clinic scientist who specializes in muscle tissue.
New research from Canada indicates one way this might work. Mark Tarnopolsky, a scientist atMcMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, has identified six muscle-specific compounds that drive mitochondrial growth in every type of human tissue.
One newly discovered myokine even tries to convert fat itself into an energy-consuming system like muscle. In 2012, a Harvard-based team identified a hormone called irisin, secreted during exercise, that tricks plain, blobby, “white” fat—and even deep visceral fat—into acting like “brown” fat, a far less common form that is dense with mitochondria and burns energy just like muscle does. Bruce Spiegelman, the Harvard scientist who led the team that discovered irisin, is now looking for a drug compound that might trigger its release.
But Febbraio cautions that exercise in a pill is not in the cards. “It’ll never happen, because the benefits of exercise are a multifactor thing,” he says. “You could never design a drug that would replace exercise.”
Just ask Bruno. For him, exercise wound up replacing the drugs.
FAT IS STUBBORN, DEMANDING stuff. Much of the time it’s telling you to eat more, which is one reason why most attempts at dieting are doomed to fail. Our fat wants to keep us fat, and most of us lack the impressive willpower of the legendary Scotsman who somehow managed to stop eating solid food for more than a year.
Known to science only as A.B., this person was 27 years old and weighed 450 pounds when he turned up at a hospital at the University of Dundee in the mid-1960s. With the encouragement of researchers, A.B. began subsisting on nothing but vitamins and brewer’s yeast, and researchers measured his progress regularly. The weight came off, but slowly: he lost less than a pound a day. In the end, he managed to slim down to 180 pounds, but it took him 382 days.
João Correia, a 38-year-old publishing executive from New York City who went through a less extreme version of Bruno’s and A.B.’s drastic slim-downs, says that the process transformed not only his body but his mind. “I had a totally different relationship with food when I was fat,” he says. A pro cyclist in his youth, Correia quit riding in his twenties, moved up the ladder of Manhattan publishing, and ate too many expense-account dinners. By age 30, he’d packed 205 pounds onto his five-eight frame, and he was still always hungry. “My ability to consume food at that weight was huge,” he recalls. “I used to be able to go to a restaurant and have six courses and a bottle or two of wine.”
The reason was a hormone called leptin, which is produced by fat tissue. Ordinarily, leptin tells the brain, “Dude, we’re fat. It’s time to stop eating.” But the brains of obese people often become deaf to leptin, so they don’t get the message.
When Correia started working for a fitness-oriented publisher, he realized he had to do something, so he got back on the bike, doing laps in Central Park before and after work. He cut back on eating, which wasn’t easy at first. Unexpectedly, as Correia’s waistline shrank, so did his appetite. You’d think that, as the fat melted off, his leptin levels would decline, making him hungrier. But research has shown that exercise actually helps restore sensitivity to leptin. So his body knew when it was time to stop eating. “I wasn’t ever hungry,” he says. Within three years, he’d lost so much weight—and gotten so fast on the bike—that he actually turned pro again, riding first in the U.S. for the Bissell team, then in Europe for the high-level (but short-lived) Cervélo Test Team.
Things weren’t quite as easy in Bruno’s case. For one thing, unlike Correia, he’d never been an elite athlete. And while Correia’s body mass index peaked at 31, just above the threshold for obesity, Phil’s BMI had been 58. His immense size meant that he may have been unusually insensitive to leptin and other signals of satiety. Going on a conventional diet was out of the question for him; he’d tried that before.
This time around, he proved himself to be every bit the equal of A.B., though his strategy was different. Rather than starve himself, he started by simply cutting out fried food, fast food, and soda. Instead, he and Susan would cook grilled chicken or fish for dinner with some greens; they snacked on fresh fruit and unsalted almonds rather than potato chips. He also (mostly) said goodbye to lasagna.
“The first 50 pounds melted off,” he says. “But when you’re eating three Quarter Pounders with Cheese at a time, any change is an improvement.” Bruno’s initial goal was just to be able to use his home scale. (At first, he was still so big that he had to go to the grocery store to weigh himself, on the same scales used to weigh food pallets.) But he also loved food, and he would still eat an extra chicken breast at dinner if he felt like it. Better that than a Quarter Pounder. He drew inspiration from motivational figures ranging from Jesus Christ to football coach Tony Dungy.
As he kept exercising, Bruno found that he not only lost weight but also felt less hungry. His burning thirst was gone, too, and his long-suffering knees and hips felt better. He threw himself into his spin classes. “We saw quite a remarkable change,” says Jim Wessely, a spin-class friend who is head of emergency medicine at St. Luke’s Hospital in St. Louis. “When he first came in, he was this huge, morbidly obese guy who could barely spin for more than a few minutes. Now he would really go at it.”
A year after Bruno was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, he went back to Dr. Livingston for tests. The doctor was astonished: Bruno’s insulin resistance was gone, and his blood values were almost back to normal. His A1C, which had been 16, was now down to 5.5. Livingston had never seen anyone do that. Bruno no longer needed his medications.
Yet Bruno knew he was far from fixed. Because of his individual metabolism, he’d been primed for weight gain his entire life. He had to fight a constant, escalating battle against his morphological fate. He remained dedicated to him regimen, going to spin class five or six days a week; eventually, he got certified, and he soon became one of the most popular instructors at that branch of Gold’s Gym. Relentlessly positive and a born organizer, he led a regular outdoor group ride on Sundays, and he captained the Golden Flyers, a 100-strong fundraising team for charity rides like the Tour de Cure (for diabetes) and the MS 150. Fitness consumed him. “I’m a financial adviser with Wells Fargo,” he says, “but most people think I’m a spinning instructor with Gold’s Gym.”
In four years, he had lost more than 200 pounds, whittling his body down below 260. He was still big, and he still wasn’t satisfied: he wanted to lose that last 50, to get down to where he’d been in high school. He kept moving, kept riding, knowing he could never stop. “It’s kind of like holding a beach ball under the water,” he told me last winter. “As long as you keep doing what you’re doing, it’s easy. As soon as you quit, then boom—it’ll pop right up.”
AND THEN, LAST SUMMER, he had to stop. He was walking out to his car after work one day in July when his legs suddenly gave out. He couldn’t stand; they were pretty much paralyzed. He managed to crawl over to a nearby car and haul himself up onto the bumper. With the help of two friendly strangers, he hobbled over to his car and got in. He had just enough sensation in his right leg that he could drive himself home.
Bruno went to the hospital that night, and doctors were mystified. He had a spinal tap, and an MRI, that revealed pinched nerves from inflammation at the base of his spinal cord. The cause was not clear. The doctor gave him steroids for the inflammation but warned that it could be a sign of something much more serious, possibly even fatal.
The inflammation subsided, luckily, but it left Bruno unable to work out, much less teach his spin classes. He skipped the MS ride in September for the first time since 2004. Inevitably, his weight started creeping back up again. By the end of the summer, he’d gained back 60 pounds. And some of the diabetes symptoms had returned.
“My legs feel like they’re filled with sand at times, the extreme thirst and hunger is back, it’s hard to breathe, I have weakness and back pain,” he told me in November. “The intense exercise I had been doing has helped me through this fight so far, but I can feel it fading as more time goes by. I’m frightened, depressed, and just not doing well at all.”
Then he had another setback, and he wound up spending six days in the hospital with heart issues—atrial fibrillation, related to the enlarged heart he’d acquired from all those years when he was heavy. Ironically, a-fib is also known to be a side effect of long-term, intense exercise, particularly in middle-aged (or older) men.
The last time we spoke, in December, Bruno had been placed on more medication, to thin his blood and prevent clotting, and on beta-blockers, to try and regularize his heartbeat. Still, he was determined to make it through his spin class that Saturday, and he surprised himself by riding hard for an hour and 10 minutes. “Everyone welcomed me back with open arms,” he says. “It was awesome.”
It’s been nearly nine years since Phil Bruno shambled into Beth Sanborn’s spin class. “I love telling people the Phil story,” she says. “Just imagine how he must have felt walking into the gym, not even a spin class. I know people who are only 50 pounds overweight, and they think they have to lose weight before setting foot in the gym.”
Since that time, Bruno has lost nearly 250 pounds, and while he’s gained some of it back, he insists that all that cycling has continued to help him, continued to protect him, even as he has backslid a little. Could his health problems be a kind of delayed-reaction result of having been so overweight for so long? That’s not how he chooses to see it. He thinks it would have been worse if he hadn’t walked into Gold’s that day. As he put it recently: “The bright spot in all this craziness is that my working out over the years has saved my life.”
Scientist Bente Pedersen, who helped discover the existence of myokines, would agree. She argues that the most dangerous issue that Bruno and people like him face is not being heavy per se but being sedentary. In papers she defines a “diseasome” of inactivity, a collection of nasty health consequences stemming from lack of exercise—independent of an individual’s body weight.
“It’s much better to be fit and fat,” she says, “than skinny and lazy.”     

7 New Weight Loss Supplements That Really Work

by Melanie Haiken

With all the new weight loss medications entering the market – and engendering controversy – many people are also looking to supplements to aid weight loss. But a visit to those shelves at your local Whole Foods or other health food store, and you’re guaranteed to feel overwhelmed.  Which really work and which don’t? And are they safe?
For information, I looked at the recommendations of prominent naturopathic doctors and the organization Natural Standard, a reputable database of the latest research on supplements.  You’ve likely never heard of many of the supplements listed here, but they’ve all a Natural Standard Grade A or B for having positive scientific evidence supporting their use for weight loss.
1. Hydroxycitrate, Hydroxycitric Acid or HCA
HCA is actually a salt derived from the rind of dried fruit, in particular the Southeast Asian plants brindal berry and Garcinia cambodia. A traditional Indian folk remedy, HCA has been used to treat joint and stomach problems. It’s sold in drug stores and supplement stores as HCA, brindleberry or brindal berry and garcinia, and is the primary ingredient in diet products with names like Citrilite, Citrin, PhyrtriMax, Bio-Max 3000, and Garcinia Trim-Pulse. Research backs the effectiveness of HCA at reducing fat absorption, increasing fat metabolism,  inhibiting appetite, and lowering LDL cholesterol.
2. Chitosan
Read about the origins of chitosan and it sounds pretty gross. Chitosan is a fiber that comes from chitin,  which is the main component in the shells (or exoskeletons, for you scientific types) of insects and crustaceans. Recommended by wholistic practitioners to lower cholesterol , chitosan has also been promoted as a type of dietary fiber that may help reduce the absorption of fat.
3. Whey protein
Healthand sports supplement stores have been touting the benefits of whey protein for years, but mainly for building muscle, which it appears to do. However, whey protein also suppresses appetite, thus helping you eat less. Whey protein, which as you can guess is derived from the whey of milk, is an easily digestible form of protein. It contains high levels of the amino acid cysteine.  And having more muscle helps with weight loss too.
4. Beta Glucan
A concentrated soluble fiber derived from yeasts, mushrooms, and algae, beta-glucans come in many forms but all have the effect of lowering cholesterol with the additional benefits of weight loss and helping control diabetes.
5. Conjugated Linoleic Acid or  CLA
Omega 3 fatty acids and healthy fats are beneficial for all sorts of things, from brain health to heart health. But one of them, CLA, seems to aid in weight loss as well (in addition to having anticancer benefits). CLA is found primarily in beef and dairy products, so if you’re vegetarian or vegan, you likely aren’t getting enough. CLA-enriched dairy products are in the works, but right now you have to take a supplement, most of which are derived from safflower oil.  CLA is one of the more popular health food supplements for reduction of body fat, though the evidence is mixed. Animal studies have sown it to be effective, but human studies have been mixed.
6. Glucomannan

Derived from an Asian plant called Konjac, glucomannan is a fiber considered extremely effective for diabetes and blood sugar control, with the additional properties of weight loss.  Glucomannan has traditionally been an important food source—whether fried, baked, or as a candy. The fiber helps absorb water in the digestive tract, reducing cholesterol and carbohydrate absorption, and research supports its role as an obesity treatment. Glucomannan is also traditionally used as a gel to be applied to the skin.
7. Mango Seed Fiber

Fiber from the seeds of the African mango tree is a traditional African weight loss remedy that’s finding new popularity either alone or combined with other dietary supplements. It’s most commonly used in Africa as a natural antibiotic  and pain reliever. It’s currently being studied for weight loss, diabetes and cholesterol reduction.